The Supreme Court’s Ohio v. American Express decision does not impose an insurmountable barrier to challenging anticompetitive conduct in so-called two-sided markets but instead offers both plaintiff…
Courts and juries have been reluctant to find that no-poach conduct qualifies as a criminal antitrust violation. This article explores the appropriate antitrust standard for no-poach agreements.
This article offers possible explanations for why the Antitrust Division at the U.S.
Department of Justice has recently lost a number of criminal trials, based on author
experience and interviews w…
This article analyzes the new merger guidelines. Gregory J. Werden explores the concept of the word “risk” used throughout the guidelines in phrases such as “risk to competition.”…
It has become commonplace for parties defending against FTC merger actions to challenge the constitutionality of the agency’s structure and practices. This article surveys the six constitutional cha…
Because identifying the relevant conduct is the first step of any antitrust analysis, courts must look for a large, unexplained reverse payment before applying the rule of reason under the Supreme Co…
We analyze a random sample of public comments submitted to the FTC on the proposed rule banning non-competes and find overrepresentation of certain segments of the economy.
Rebate contracting between drug manufacturers and PBMs and health plans faces increasing scrutiny for its impact on drug pricing. This article explores the theory behind so-called “rebate wall” clai…